Image: Barry Neufeld.

By The Canadian Press

Legal battle

Former Chilliwack school trustee to contest $750,000 penalty for anti-SOGI campaign

Feb 23, 2026 | 2:31 PM

VANCOUVER — The lawyer for former Chilliwack, B.C., school trustee Barry Neufeld says he will be filing a court challenge against a ruling by the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal that he poisoned the workplaces of LGBTQ+ staff members with a public campaign against classroom resources on sexual orientation and gender identity.

Lawyer James Kitchen says Neufeld will be seeking a judicial review in the B.C. Supreme Court after the tribunal last week ordered him to pay $750,000 to members of the Chilliwack Teachers Association who identify as LGBTQ+.

Critics of the ruling have included federal Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre and British comedian John Cleese, while it has been applauded by the B.C. human rights commissioner and the BC Teachers’ Federation.

Kitchen says Neufeld was not surprised by the outcome, noting that he and his client were discussing a judicial review and appeals before the hearing started.

He called the tribunal’s decision a “foregone conclusion,” but said in an interview that they intend to challenge “pretty much all of the findings” at the B.C. Supreme Court — and will continue the fight as far as it goes, which he expects will be the B.C. Court of Appeal.

Two snowmobilers die after falling through ice in central B.C.: police

2h ago

Legal battle

Former Chilliwack school trustee to contest $750,000 penalty for anti-SOGI campaign

4h ago

B.C. police release photo of now-deported extortion suspect in appeal for information

6h ago

The Feb. 18 ruling came more than eight years after the BC Teachers’ Federation and Chilliwack Teachers’ Association filed the human rights complaint against Neufeld on behalf of their members, specifically those who identified as LGBTQ+ from October 2017 through 2022.

It says that for five years, Neufeld “publicly denigrated LGBTQ people and teachers and associated them with the worst forms of child abuse,” which created a discriminatory work environment for teachers in the district.

The ruling says he exposed educators to “repeated messages that their very existence was a threat to children, families and social order,” invoking “the most insidious discriminatory stereotypes and tropes” to denigrate their efforts to create an inclusive education environment for LGBTQ+ students.

It says his statements, framed as criticism of the classroom resources known as SOGI 123, included warning that teaching children about diverse sexual orientations primes them for sexual abuse and “characterized trans people, especially children, as confused, abused, manipulated, sexualized, mutilated and deceptive.”

It noted that Neufeld denied his statements were derogatory and argued he was “simply targeting a set of ideas.” But the tribunal said it disagreed.

Kitchen said his arguments before the tribunal were more tailored for a judicial review than the tribunal, so much of the arguments will remain the same.

Neufeld issued a reaction to the decision on his website, where he says he is “concerned about protecting children from confusing and dangerous ideologies.”

The statement says the tribunal knows he will not be able to pay the $750,000, but that the decision sets a precedent so “in the future, no one else will ever dare to criticize their sacred Gender Ideology.”

“So I must try to overturn this draconian decision,” he said.

“We are applying for a judicial review at the BC Supreme Court, which is effectively an appeal to the ‘real’ courts.”

He called the large financial penalty a “blessing in disguise,” saying it has “shocked everyone into realizing that the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal is on a power trip.”

“If it had only been $75,000 everyone would have ignored it and thought Barry Neufeld deserved it for being so outspoken,” he said.

The ruling has garnered criticism online, including from British comedian Cleese, who said that as a result of the ruling he will not “risk” scheduling any shows in B.C. while touring Canada this fall.

Conservative Leader Poilievre issued a statement on Sunday calling the ruling “insane and Orwellian.”

“We must defend the truth and free speech against these mad censors,” Poilievre said in the post.

Meanwhile, B.C.’s human rights commissioner, Kasari Govender, welcomed the ruling and said in a statement last week that it “affirms that hateful statements or publications are not shielded from the Human Rights Code because they are part of public or political discourse.”

“Publishing statements that deny trans identities and rely on stereotypes create significant harm,” Govender says in a statement issued Thursday.

“The decision is significant for ensuring that human rights laws apply to political and public statements from our elected officials and affirming that trans people are entitled to have their identities recognized and rights respected.”

Harman Bhangu, a B.C. Conservative leadership candidate, called the tribunal a “kangaroo court run by a woke activist judiciary.”

“When I become Premier: it’s gone on day one,” he said on social media Saturday.

Fellow candidate Caroline Elliott issued a similar statement on Sunday, saying the $750,000 penalty “kills free speech and erodes democracy.”

“British Columbians are forced to spend millions to fund this playground for NDP activists to live out their social justice dreams as needed programs are cut,” she said in her post to X.

“The NDP’s so-called ‘Human Rights Tribunal’ has got to go.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 23, 2026.

Brieanna Charlebois, The Canadian Press