Mission residents push back on proposed tax hike to fund new civic buildings

The Public Safety Building, which is expected to cost $39 million, will house a new fire hall and serve as the community’s new Emergency Operations Centre.

Image: The City of Mission is set to decide on a proposed borrowing bylaw and a new City Hall in Outlook Village (pictured) Monday, July 7. / City of Mission

But Mission residents like Derek Pellizzari, co-founder and CEO of Kika Marketing & Communications, say the increase in property taxes to fund this initiative constitutes an “undue burden on homeowners and may deter new residents from moving to our community.”

“To foster growth and maintain Mission’s appeal as a vibrant and affordable place to live, I believe we must prioritize keeping taxes low,” Pellizzari wrote in an email to Fraser Valley Today and the City of Mission. “As an alternative, I propose that the City consider expanding and renovating the existing City Hall building to achieve the desired benefits—such as improved accessibility, consolidated services, and adequate workspace—while significantly reducing costs. By pursuing a more cost-effective solution, the City can address critical needs without increasing the tax burden on residents. I respectfully oppose any tax increase associated with the current proposal and urge the Council to explore options that align with the financial realities of our community.”

Pellizzari says he recognizes the need for improved facilities to address accessibility issues and accommodate staff and community needs, but not on the backs of Mission ratepayers.

“However, I am deeply concerned that the proposed project comes at a time when many Mission residents are facing financial challenges,” he said.

In the Mission BC & Neighbours Facebook group, the proposed tax increase isn’t sitting well with many residents either.

“Agree, this is not the time to be spending that kind of money when so many people are struggling. District of Mission should be setting an example,” Sally and Ron Hughes wrote in a post authored by Jane Johnson.

“We pay the highest taxes for basically nothing!” Vicky Kalinsky wrote on Facebook. “This council and mayor are completely out of touch. We don’t need a new city hall, we need better hospital, better roads and places people can take there (sic) kids to have fun. The taxes we pay to live here are ridiculous!”

“Why do you need a fancy new building for administration??” Brenda Watkins wrote.

Several councillors shared their appeal on social media on Friday (Jul. 4), urging residents to voice their concerns before the next council meeting.

“Over the past day, I’ve heard from so many of you — thoughtful, passionate residents who genuinely care about Mission and the direction we’re heading,” wrote Councillor Jag Gill. “[W]e may not all agree on every detail — but I believe we all want what’s best for Mission. Let’s keep showing up for each other, with respect, with integrity, and with the future in mind.”

“These are significant decisions, with property tax impacts. Council will be deciding on whether to accept the proposed borrowing bylaw on Monday […] so it’s critical to hear your opinions as soon as possible,” shared Councillor Mark Davies.

The overall tax increase for both projects is 4.7 per cent — on top of a projected 6.65 per cent overall increase for 2026.

Council is set to decide on the proposed City Hall on Monday, July 7, at 6 p.m.

by Mike Vanden Bosch and Alyssa Conti

Mission residents push back on proposed tax hike to fund new civic buildings

More Local News