YOUR PERSPECTIVE: Stop the Cycle of Political Violence Before It Ignites
Two weeks ago, Charlie Kirk, a controversial American conservative speaker, was murdered – assassinated – in public for promoting controversial and polarizing political views.
Unfortunately, this isn’t even an isolated event but the latest in a series of political violence against figures from different political views. And Canada – the Fraser Valley, even – is not immune. Violence has no place in a democracy. We can argue. We can disagree. We can yell, shout, scream, cry, or debate. But violence is not a justifiable method of conflict resolution inside a democracy.
Violence is a symptom of the decline of democracy. When we resort to violence rather than dialogue, we are claiming that democracy, for all its promise, doesn’t actually work. Because if democracy worked, if engaging in civic dialogue to resolve communal problems actually worked, then disagreements would be solved with discourse and a respect for the democratic process.
Political violence is the absolute breakdown of democracy. Violence begets violence. This is not a cycle that will stop on its own. We need to do better.
